The College continuously monitors the academic progress of students to ensure the attainment of programme outcomes and course outcomes. To attain the Course Outcome, every department of the college makes an effort by preparing teaching plan through proper discussion among the faculty members through departmental meetings before commencement of academic session.

The College regularly evaluates the attainment of Programme Outcomes and Course Outcomes to assess the teaching learning process and also to figure out the outcomes for the students. The College adopts the following mechanism to evaluate the Programme Outcome and Course Outcome.

  1. The sessional examination marks: Sessional examinations are conducted by the College as per the academic calendar of affiliating University to observe the knowledge of the students. This is done on the basis of marks secured by the students in their sessional examination.
  2. Result analysis: The attainment of Programme Outcome and Course Outcome is done through the result analysis. Each and every department of the college do the result analysis and it is conveyed to the students.
  3. Departmental seminar and Group discussion: The departments organize departmental seminars, group discussions, quizzes, mock test etc. to assess the programme outcome and course outcome.
  4. Project and Home Assignment: The students are assigned projects and home assignments on particular topics to measure their knowledge and comprehension.
  5. Student’s progression and placement: Student’s progression and placement report is prepared by each department of the College to measure the attainment of programme outcomes in the College.
  6. Feedback mechanism: Feedback taken from students and their parents on the course curriculum and teachers’ performance help to assess the teaching-learning and evaluation system of the college.
  7. Parent-teachers meet: The college and the departments conduct the Parent- Teacher Meets regularly to review the teaching-learning and evaluation process.
  8. Alumni meet: Alumni meets are organized by the alumni association of the college and also by the departments to evaluate the teaching-learning and evaluation process.
  9. Mentor-Mentee process: The College has been continuously adopting the Mentor-Mentee process since 2018 to assess the performance of the students in their sessional and end examination of each semester. This Mentor-Mentee process also entails the psychological counseling of the students including their academic performances.
  10. Career counselling cell: The College has a permanent Career Counseling and Placement Cell to offer proper guidance to the students on various career options and employability avenues.

Attainment of PO and COs

Pass percentage of students during last five years

(BA)

Year Stream Number of students appeared Number of students passed Pass percentage Remarks
2020 BA  395 388 98.23 NON-CBCS
2021 BA 365 363 99.45 NON-CBCS
2022 BA 310 288 92.9 CBCS
2023 BA 353 338 95.75 CBCS
2024 BA 441 373 84.58 CBCS

Pass percentage of students during last five years

(B.Sc.)

Year Stream Number of students appeared Number of students passed Pass percentage Remarks
2020 B.Sc. 86 83 96.51 NON-CBCS
2021 B.Sc. 61 61 100 NON-CBCS
2022 B.Sc. 89 82 92.13 CBCS
2023 B.Sc. 89 81 91.01 CBCS
2024 B.Sc. 43 29 67.44 CBCS

t” test is used to assess the outcome of BA and B.Sc. final year examinations of MDKG College and t test results of both BA and B.Sc. are shown below.

‘t’ test result of BA outcome of last five years

The two-tailed P = .4389
By conventional criteria, this difference is considered to be not statistically significant.
Confidence Interval:
The mean of appeared minus passed equals is 22.80
95% confidence interval of this difference is from -41.75 to 87.35 Intermediate values used in the calculations:
t=.8145
Df =8
Standard error or difference=27.992

Group Appeared Passed
Mean 372.80 350.00
Standard deviation 48.84 39.15
SEM 21.84 17.51
N 5 5

‘t’ test result of B.Sc. outcome of last five years

The two-tailed P = .6581
By conventional criteria, this difference is considered to be not statistically significant.
Confidence Interval:
The mean of appeared minus passed equals is 6.40
95% confidence interval of this difference is from -25.72 to 38.52 Intermediate values used in the calculations:
t=.4595
Df =8
Standard error or difference=13.928

Group Appeared Passed
Mean 372.80 350.00
Standard deviation 48.84 39.15
SEM 21.84 17.51
N 5 5